First Appeal on Regional Transport Office - Tampering with Records

FAA – RTO è PIO didn’t honored 

section-6(3) of RTI Act & even 

FAA address NOT communicated 

to RTI Applicant & PIO Allows 

Tampering of Records & 

PIO working contrary to 

Motor Vehicles Act 

with malafide intention

To                                                                    Dated 17/07/2016

First Appellate Authority,

CHIEF GENERAL MANAGER,

DTC HQ, I.P.ESTATE,

New Delhi-110002

Sub:-   with reference to MLO (NWZ-I)/DWARKA/2016/176 Dated: 16/07/2016   

Respected Sir,

In reference to RTI response by PIO to above REFERENCE NUMBER I would like to humbly state that the PIO has provided highly misleading answers as follows:-

(1)   In point no.1, 2 & 8 of my RTI he simply stated that the matter relates to prosecution department but he did not honored the section 6(3) of RTI Act’2005 to transfer the RTI.

(2)   Name of First Appellate Authority was not provided to me intentionally which proves his malafide intention to block me to approach the FAA.

(3)   In point no.15,16,17,20,22 he insisted to lodge a formal complaint even after I clearly attached proofs (ten enclosures) which very well proved the identity fraud (name fraud) played on your esteemed authority which he could have very easily verified by issuing notices to concerned party & get their say under the provisions of the RTI Rules’2005 which he did not & hence this appeal.

(4)   In point no.18 he mentioned that in case subsequently information founds concealed or misrepresented then action will be initiated against that person under MV Act’1988. At this point he seems to be making fun of the entire system because on one hand I have presented all the proofs which clearly prove the name fraud done to your esteemed authority by way of concealment & misrepresentation & on the other hand he wishes to take action only after a formal complaint is lodged. This also brings shame to our nation India where some officer holding such high position try to evade from their responsibility.

(5)   In point 16 he mentions records are weeded out & he wanted to make the RTI applicant believe that in less than two years time record is weeded out by such an esteemed authority thereby clearly putting a question mark on the record retention period.

(6)   In this regard it is iterated that, As per MV Act’1988 r/w 19. Power of licensing authority to disqualify from holding a driving licence or revoke such licence (e) has obtained any driving licence or a licence to drive a particular class or description of motor vehicle by fraud or misrepresentation.

PRAYER:-

(1)   To pass necessary directions in the light of above facts & circumstances

(2)   To initiate action against the erring PIO u/s 20 of RTI Act’2005

Any other reliefs/ order as this Hon’ble FAA deems fit.

 (ATUR CHATUR)

C/o   Q-7/77, GF, Sector-30, Rohini, Delhi-110085

Email:          aturchatur@yahoo.com

Phone:                         09873540498